AI visibility audit: how to benchmark your company against competitors in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot
An AI visibility audit tests a fixed set of 30 to 50 buyer questions in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Mode, scores whether you and three to five competitors are named, in what position, how accurately and from which sources, and turns the gaps into a prioritised backlog. Run it before you invest, so the budget goes to the questions and sources where you are losing.
Key takeaways
- Audit across engines: Similarweb (vendor data) reports ChatGPT’s share of generative AI web traffic fell from about 76% to about 53% in a year as Gemini grew.
- Use your own question set; ChatGPT Business Hub shows mentions and themes for ChatGPT only, with no competitor view.
- Score five things per answer: named or not, position, accuracy, sources cited and competitors named.
- The output is a backlog of pages and third-party sources, not a score.
Why audit before you invest
Budgets for AI visibility often start with a tool subscription or a content push. Without a baseline, nobody can tell later whether the money changed anything, or whether it went to questions where you were already winning.
An audit answers three questions first: where are we named today, who is named instead of us, and which sources are assistants using to decide. Since OpenAI launched Business Hub on November 10, 2026, there is also first-party ChatGPT data to compare against. Our launch guide to ChatGPT Business Hub explains how to claim the profile and see it.
Treat the audit as a fixed cost and the program that follows as the variable one. A good audit is cheap relative to a year of content and PR, and it decides where that money goes.
Which engines to include
Include every assistant your buyers use, not only ChatGPT. Similarweb, a traffic analytics vendor, reports that ChatGPT’s share of worldwide generative AI web traffic fell from roughly 76% to about 53% in a year, and that Gemini’s app reached about 716 million monthly users in May 2026. Forrester found business buyers are four times as likely as consumers to use Microsoft Copilot, often in company versions.
Ask sales which assistants buyers mention in calls and which tools your largest customers use internally. If most target accounts run Microsoft 365, Copilot deserves the same weight as ChatGPT in the audit, even though its consumer audience is smaller. If buyers are technical, Perplexity often matters more than its traffic share suggests, because it shows its sources and is used for research.
| Engine | Why it matters for B2B | First-party data available |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Largest assistant; where many shortlists start | Business Hub: mentions, profile views, website clicks, discovery topics (28 days) |
| Google Gemini and AI Mode | Built into Google search and Workspace | Search Console for your own Google search data; no competitor view |
| Microsoft Copilot | Inside Microsoft 365 at many enterprises | Bing Webmaster Tools AI Performance: citations and cited pages, no clicks |
| Perplexity | Research-heavy users; shows sources openly | None for brands; test directly |
Step by step: how to run the audit
- Build the question set: 30 to 50 questions buyers ask before they shortlist, grouped by stage (problem, category, comparison, pricing, alternatives, implementation). Use sales call notes and search queries, not your own product language.
- Pick three to five competitors: the ones you lose deals to, not the biggest names in the market.
- Run each question in each engine, in a clean session, at least twice, and save the full answer with the date.
- Score each answer on five fields: named (yes or no), position in any list, accuracy of what is said, sources cited, and competitors named.
- Add first-party data: Business Hub mentions and clicks for ChatGPT and Bing AI Performance citations for Copilot.
- Summarise by stage and engine, then list the ten questions and five third-party sources with the biggest gaps.
Get an AI visibility read across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google AI Overviews.
A scoring sheet you can copy
| Field | How to score | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Named | 1 if your company is named, 0 if not | The basis of share of answer |
| Position | 1 if first, 0.5 if in the top three, 0.25 if lower | Buyers read the first names more closely |
| Accuracy | Correct, partly wrong or wrong, with the error noted | Wrong facts lose deals silently and create risk |
| Sources cited | List the domains | Shows where to earn coverage |
| Competitors named | List them in order | Shows who is winning the question |
Answers vary from run to run, so treat a single run as a sample. Two runs per question per engine, repeated monthly, give a usable trend. Our guide to measuring share of answer in ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews explains the method in more depth.
How to read the results
- Absent everywhere on category questions: your site and listings do not describe the category clearly. Start with answer-first category pages and directory listings.
- Named on brand questions, absent on comparison questions: competitors own the comparison content. Publish your own comparisons and alternatives pages.
- Named but described wrongly: trace each error to its source and fix it there. Our guide to fixing wrong AI answers about your company sets out the steps.
- Strong in one engine, weak in another: check crawler access and the sources each engine cites; they differ.
- Competitors cited from the same few sites: those sites are your PR and review targets for the next two quarters.
Turning the audit into a budget
The audit should end with a decision, not a deck. Group the gaps into the five budget lines most AI visibility programs need: measurement, answer-first content, third-party authority, technical and data, and profile governance. Then estimate effort for each gap and rank by the value of the question, using deal data where you have it.
In our view, three patterns justify investment straight away: competitors named on comparison and alternatives questions you lose deals on, material errors about products or pricing, and a small number of third-party sites cited in most answers where you are missing. If the audit shows you already lead on most priority questions, the budget should go to protecting the position and to conversion, not to more content.
Free check first, full audit second
For a quick first view, our free AI visibility checker shows how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews describe you against competitors. A full audit adds your own question set, scoring across engines, first-party data and a prioritised backlog.
Our generative engine optimization team can run a full audit for your company and turn it into a 12-month plan.
If you want to see where you stand before you commit budget, talk to our team and we will review your category in a free 30-minute pipeline plan.
Frequently asked questions
What is an AI visibility audit?
A structured test of how AI assistants describe your company and competitors for the questions buyers ask, scored for mentions, position, accuracy and sources, and turned into a prioritised backlog.
How many questions should an AI visibility audit include?
Usually 30 to 50 buyer questions, grouped by buying stage, tested in each engine at least twice.
Can ChatGPT Business Hub replace an AI visibility audit?
No. Business Hub reports your own ChatGPT mentions, clicks and themes over 28 days. It shows no prompts, no competitors and no other engines.
How often should we repeat the audit?
Run the full audit once before investing, then re-run the same question set monthly and the full audit once a year or after a major model or product change.
Which AI assistants should B2B companies benchmark?
ChatGPT, Google Gemini and AI Mode, Microsoft Copilot and Perplexity at minimum, plus any assistant your buyers use inside their own tools.
Should we use a tool or run the audit manually?
Either works if the question set and scoring are yours. Tools save time on repeated runs; a manual first audit forces the team to read the answers, which is where most insights come from.
Sources
- OpenAI Help Center: Setting up your business on ChatGPT (read November 12, 2026)
- Similarweb (vendor research): Is AI replacing search? What the 2026 numbers actually reveal (August 4, 2026)
- Forrester: B2B buyers make zero-click buying number one (January 22, 2026)
- Search Engine Land: Bing Webmaster Tools launches AI Performance report (2026)
- Hans van Gent (practitioner newsletter): ChatGPT Business Hub (November 10, 2026)
- LLM Pulse (AI visibility tool vendor): ChatGPT Business Hub (November 11, 2026)
Related service: Generative engine optimization. See also pricing and client results.
We run enterprise B2B demand generation for teams in Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa and the United States.